The Paradox of Welcome: Restoring the Intergenerational Welcome of the Church

In the communities I’ve observed, there’s a new hesitation over how to respond to infants.

---

The bustle of arrival is at its peak around the fifteen-minute mark before service begins on a Sunday morning. A comfortable murmur accompanies families bringing their potluck dishes for the fellowship lunch, and a receiving line of hands take hot plates, crockpots, bags of goods, and baked pastries for the coffee break. Yet amid this familiar bustle something has changed—a subtle shift that speaks volumes about our collective mindset. The joyful welcome rush is suspended when a particular guest arrives: a newborn child.

In the communities I’ve observed, there’s a new hesitation over how to respond to infants. While it flows from concern for parental preferences and a commendable desire not to cause offense, it reflects deeper cultural anxieties and poses a challenge to the church’s commitment to hospitality.

For instance, pastors are now requesting members refrain from interacting with newborns, citing parental wishes, which contrasts with traditional communal blessings. It’s counterintuitive—the nature of this request within a faith community—so we must ask how has the celebration of a new life morphed into a mandate for separation, and what does this reveal about our modern anxieties and theological blind spots? These emerging social norms betray a child-centered idolatry and hyper-individualized parenting that risks diminishing the Christ-centered calling of the church.

The Sheltered Sanctuary: Navigating the New Boundaries of Parenthood

The body of Christ is formed of members, young and old. It has a cultural liturgy—shared habits and rituals that shape a community’s values, sometimes unconsciously. Children should be warmly welcomed into this community. Women, and even men, resort to baby-talk—a softer tone, higher pitch, almost unintelligible speech—when a baby is in their arms, bouncing or wiggling about. Yet children can become idols when they are dictating new social rhythms and behaviors. When a child becomes the de facto center of existence, the parent’s primary worship becomes the child’s comfort and safety, rather than the community’s spiritual health.

Congregants now steer clear from a new baby who makes his appearance at church for the first time because there is a rise in intense parental anxiety. This anxiety often centers on fears about germs and perceived threats. Such fears are downstream from the cultural pressure to raise perfect children. Moreover, the overwhelming nature of new parenthood can lead to a desire for absolute control in an uncontrollable situation. A biblical understanding of human vulnerability suggests that our limitations are opportunities for experiencing God’s grace rather than reasons for excessive fear. This perspective encourages communities to support one another rather than insist on isolation.

The Church’s Discouragement: A Breach in the Welcome

When a new mother shares news of her pregnancy, the congregation prays for both the child’s safe delivery and the mother’s health. Yet, there is a contradiction when the same congregation is asked not to come near to the life they prayed over. There is a cognitive dissonance here, and it goes against the spirit of hospitality, which is central to the church’s role as a welcoming and intergenerational body of Christ. Telling members to keep their distance challenges the fundamental identity of the church and creates division because they are implicitly presumed to be a threat or irresponsible.

In any other country, it’s common for friends and congregants to hold new babies. It’s as if being born in this country is more dangerous than being born in another country. The emphasis on shielding children, often found in affluent societies, can inadvertently create an atmosphere of hypervigilance that undermines the organic bonds of fellowship and support. Instead of fostering genuine connection and celebrating the resilience that is part of welcoming new life, these practices can distance parents from the very community they and their children need.

Visits from church members are often welcomed in the home setting, where the boundaries seem less rigid and the gestures of care are more easily received, but this contrasts with the social hesitation in more public settings. This difference reveals a conflict between sincere care for newborn wellbeing and the desire for community, showing that limits on interaction can be influenced not just by what parents want but also by excessive caution that diminishes social warmth. While it is important to acknowledge that some new parents sincerely worry about exposing vulnerable infants to illness, these concerns can be addressed thoughtfully—through open communication and a spirit of mutual respect—without sacrificing the church’s hospitality.

When congregations fail to hold and play with babies, the implicit message is that children are too fragile for the body of Christ. This violates the biblical vision of children as integrated members of the covenant community. Think, for example, of Mark’s account of Jesus’s response to those who sought to keep children isolated from him: “But when Jesus saw it, he was much displeased, and said unto them, Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God. Verily I say unto you, whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein. And he took them up in his arms, put his hands upon them, and blessed them.” Ultimately, the biblical call to welcome, as seen in Romans and the example in the gospel of Mark, challenges the congregation to balance prudent care with inclusion, affirming that each new life is a gift meant to be celebrated and enfolded within the body of Christ.

We can remember how difficult it was to enforce social distancing during the COVID lockdowns, and that sense of restriction still feels relevant in this situation. There is a logical alternative, however, if the environment at church is truly perceived as dangerous by a new mother. In this case, it may be prudent for the new mother to stay home and self-regulate her attendance until she is comfortable to be out in public, without imposing blanket restrictions that undermine hospitality and harmony in the church body. Leviticus 12 prescribes a period of postpartum separation for mothers, focusing on rest and ritual purification. Although these traditional practices differ from contemporary standards, they underscore the significance of supporting both physical recuperation and participation in spiritual community.

Towards a Fuller Welcome: Re-enchanting Community

How can the church renew its role in celebrating and integrating new life, fostering a resilient, grace-filled approach to parenthood? The answer lies in physical proximity. Becoming a welcoming church is not just about touch, but about prayer, practical support (such as meal trains or laundry and cleaning assistance for post-partum moms), mentorship, and creating a safe, spiritual space for families to grow as they navigate overwhelming schedules with a newborn. If we trust God’s sovereignty, we’re called to a deeper trust in God’s protection and provision and to recognize the necessary role churches play in a child’s growth.

Excessive anxiety about natural events such as the birth of a child may inadvertently show a lack of trust in God’s presence and protection. Within an intergenerational approach to worship, we can acknowledge and celebrate the mutual learning and support that appears across age groups, especially during significant life transitions. It is incumbent upon pastors and parents to cultivate an open and integrated community, ensuring that all members—regardless of age or experience—feel welcomed and supported. In doing so, modern tendencies about distancing newborns and their mothers from the body of Christ become unnecessary, replaced by a culture of Christ-like wholeness.

Barna Group research has shown that although some churches include multiple generations, few exercise meaningful interaction between age groups. Isolating infants from the congregation can hinder natural community bonds and affect children’s long-term faith retention, as essential simple habits like engaging with newborns support lasting fellowship. This phenomenon, “Sticky Faith,” was researched from the Fuller Youth Institute where findings indicated that the most reliable predictor of a child’s long-term faith is the consistency of their adult relationships within the church. By insisting on a mandate for separation, we sabotage this spiritual opportunity.

The church can look forward with hope by embracing a hospitable attitude, treating new life not as something to be feared or avoided but as an opportunity to see God’s greatness in everyday moments. However, this requires intentional action. Recommending that people keep their distance from a newborn goes against the spirit of unity in Christ; it highlights the tension between modern parenting anxieties and the Christian belief in welcome and community that Jesus exemplified. A child raised in a supportive, unified church community better reflects God’s intent for togetherness than one that is intent